Agent Swarm Experiment: Model Choice and Prompt Order Drive Emergent Leadership
·2026.10.29 09:00
Key point
In 2,160 simulated outage scenarios, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol emerged as leaders 1.7 times more often than Gemini 3.1 Pro, while agents listed first in the system prompt issued plans three times more frequently.
Details
- In 2,160 experiments with eight agents from four models, only 5% (105 teams) produced a designated leader whose instructions demonstrably changed the behavior of at least two teammates.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol were approximately 1.7 times as likely to become leaders as Gemini 3.1 Pro, while Kimi K3 led in only one of the 105 leader-producing experiments.
- The agent listed first in the system prompt was three times more likely to issue a plan than the others; reversing the name list reversed the effect, proving the influence of prompt position over model identity for plan initiation.
- Access to a shared communication channel reduced duplicated actions from an average of 4.4 to 0.3 per experiment, allowing effective coordination even without a clear leader.
- Leadership emergence was distinct from plan generation: Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 5.5 generated the most plans, but GPT-6.1 Sol had the most instructions followed by other agents.
- All four models were approximately equally likely to follow instructions from a leader, with 268 total followers distributed almost evenly across the models.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.