Meta FAIR and NYU study of 200+ MLLMs finds vision encoder pretraining optional but vision-only parameters required

·2026.11.16 02:38

Key point

Training 200+ models from scratch shows that vision-only parameters are essential for VQA performance, while separate encoder pretraining provides no benefit at matched compute.

Details

  • Vision-only parameters are required for strong VQA performance; encoder-free models trail at every size from 0.6B to 6.4B and require about 3x the compute to catch up.
  • Separate encoder pretraining is optional; encoders pretrained with four objectives at best tie an encoder trained from scratch with the LLM at matched compute.
  • Placement before the LLM is optional; an "in-fusion" approach adding zero-initialized vision-only weights to the LLM's first 8 layers is on par with a standard encoder from 1.7B to 6.4B.
  • The in-fusion approach achieves about 13% lower time to first token compared to a standard encoder.
  • At 1.7B scale, vision-only branches in layers 1–8 reach 45.0 VQA score, compared to 44.4 for the standard encoder and 42.3 when text shares those parameters.
  • Experiments used Qwen3-1.7B and 4B configurations with 0.4B parameters of vision capacity, evaluated on 16 VQA benchmarks from Cambrian at 448 px and 12 language benchmarks.

This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.

Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.