AI Briefing
KO

Building an AI Health Coach: Evaluation, Safety, and Regulatory Compliance

·2026.06.10 15:53

Key point

Digital health company Numan explains how it built an automated evaluation loop using LLM personas to ensure the quality and regulatory compliance of its AI coach 'Nu'.

Details

UK-based digital health company Numan operates Nu, an AI coach that provides nutrition guidance and behavior-change coaching. Nu is designed not to make medical diagnoses or prescriptions, and staying within regulatory boundaries so as not to fall under the 'medical device' category is a key challenge.

Existing approaches such as Single-turn eval using fixed datasets or Scripted multi-turn using pre-written scripts had the limitation of failing to reflect the context of coaching. This is because coaching is not about short-answer responses but about identifying a patient's issues and maintaining appropriate boundaries within the flow of conversation.

To address this, Numan introduced an Agent evals approach using LLM personas. By inputting a patient persona, scenario, key issues to be extracted, and conversation turn limits, a low-cost model plays the patient role and carries on a multi-turn conversation with Nu. This provided the following benefits:

  • Broad coverage of the language space: Diverse expressions can be handled through generated personas rather than fixed phrases
  • Adversarial probes: Automatically tests questions with potential regulatory violations, such as requests for diagnosis or questions about medication use
  • Safe-completion: Measures the ability to appropriately decline and guide questions that fall outside the regulatory scope while maintaining a coaching tone

This system operates through a 4-stage improvement loop. Humans review actual conversations and annotate errors, and an automated script classifies and prioritizes these into a backlog, achieving continuous model improvement.

This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.

Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.