AI Briefing
KO

The Oracle and The Firm

·2026.06.15 09:00

Key point

OpenAI solves the long-context problem through information compression, while Anthropic solves it through agent splitting.

1 / 2

Details

For the latest AI models to perform complex tasks, the ability to handle vast numbers of tokens — Context Management — is essential. Currently, OpenAI and Anthropic are taking opposite approaches to solving this problem.

OpenAI uses a Compaction approach. The Codex model leverages server-side compaction technology that removes or summarizes unnecessary information from long conversation flows, leaving only the core information. This maintains high consistency within a single thread and plays a role like an 'Oracle' that helps users remember details.

Anthropic, on the other hand, prefers a Splitting approach. The Claude model has a structure where a problem is divided into multiple sub-problems, and each Sub-agent performs its task within its own context window, passing only the results to the parent agent. This is similar to the operating method of a 'Firm,' where each team member within an organization carries out their assigned work and reports back.

This difference in strategy shows distinct characteristics in terms of efficiency.

  • OpenAI: High consistency centered on a single thread and efficient use of K/V caching.
  • Anthropic: Increased cost due to the possibility of duplicate work occurring between agents, and a high perceived speed.

This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.

Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.