New 10 GbE USB Adapter Is Cooler, Smaller, and Cheaper
Key point
The RTL8159-based 10GbE USB adapter turned out smaller, cheaper, and less hot.
Details
I tested an RTL8159-based 10G USB 3.2 adapter on 4 computers. WisdPi's $80 model was smaller and cheaper than existing 10 GbE Thunderbolt adapters, and ran cooler too.
Performance depended heavily on USB port bandwidth.
- On an AMD desktop (USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, 20 Gbps), speeds came close to 10 Gbps.
- Other devices generally stayed around 6-7 Gbps.
- On Mac, it worked without drivers, but the link speed shown in settings incorrectly displayed as 2500Base-T.
- On Windows, the device was recognized, but the network only worked after installing the Realtek driver.
Bidirectional testing also showed big platform differences.
- The two Mac devices had relatively symmetric upload and download speeds.
- The Framework and desktop showed a clear gap between upload and download performance.
- The desktop PC recorded 9.5 Gbps download and about 5 Gbps upload.
Heat was lower than expected. Under USB 2 speed conditions, power consumption was about 0.86W, and even after several minutes of bidirectional iperf3 testing, the temperature only rose to 42.5°C. It didn't overheat the way existing Aquantia-based 10Gb adapters do.
In conclusion, this adapter is appealing for environments that need RJ45-based 10Gbps and have matching USB port conditions. However, since actual efficiency depends heavily on the system and port specs, there are still many cases where a 2.5G/5G adapter offers better value for money.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.