AI BriefingGuidelines for Using AI Assistance Tools When Contributing to the Linux Kernel
Key point
The Linux kernel enforces its existing procedures and signatures even for AI-assisted contributions.
Details
The official Linux kernel documentation outlines principles for contributing with the help of AI coding tools.
Even when using AI tools, contributors must still follow the existing kernel development process.
- Kernel Development Process
- Linux kernel coding style
- Submitting patches procedure
The core rules are clear.
- AI cannot add a Signed-off-by tag.
- Only a human can legally certify the DCO.
- The human submitter must review the AI-generated code, verify license compliance, and attach their own Signed-off-by.
- Ultimate responsibility rests with the human developer.
Additionally, if tool-generated content is used in a meaningful way outside the Signed-off-by chain, separate guidelines apply.
- The cover letter and changelog must transparently disclose which tools were used.
- Contributors may note the prompts used, the inputs, the parts affected, and how testing was done.
- Maintainers may choose stricter review, additional testing, or rejection as needed.
In short, AI is merely an assistive means to help with kernel contributions, and the procedures and responsibility remain entirely with humans.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.
Related
Foremerge v0.5.0 Released: Rust-Based Open-Source Tool Detects Intent Conflicts Between Parallel AI Coding Agents
Atlas: Open-Source Source Control Tool for Multi-Agent Coding WorkflowsToken-Space Font Compiler Generates Fonts with Fixed Token WidthsWhiteboard Launches Open-Source VS Code Fork for Human-AI Collaborative Software Design