OpenAI's Response to NIST's AI Executive Order
Key point
OpenAI responded to NIST's Request for Information related to the AI Executive Order, submitting its views on AI risk evaluation and safety frameworks.
Details
OpenAI responded to NIST's Request for Information (RFI) under the AI Executive Order, presenting its views on three key topics: AI capability evaluation, red-teaming, and synthetic media and provenance.
OpenAI currently tracks four major risk areas—cybersecurity, CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear), persuasion, and model autonomy—through its Preparedness Framework to mitigate potential risks.
In a recent large-scale evaluation related to CBRN, GPT-4 showed only a mild uplift in its ability to provide information on generating biological threats compared to existing internet search results. This suggests the importance of measuring how much greater a risk AI poses compared to existing resources.
For effective AI risk evaluation, OpenAI emphasized the following three principles:
- Measuring change relative to a baseline: The degree to which AI poses greater risk than existing resources (e.g., internet search) should be measured.
- Collaboration with domain experts: External experts in the relevant field should be involved in study design and scoring to ensure objective evaluation.
- Collaboration with AI experts: Evaluations should be designed based on a deep understanding of AI systems in order to fully elicit a model's potential capabilities.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.