Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on an NP-Hard Problem: Does /goal Mode Help
Key point
Claude Fable 5 showed superior performance and consistency over GPT-5.6 Sol on an NP-Hard optimization problem.
Details
We ran a comparative experiment between Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol using the KIRO benchmark, an unpublished NP-hard optimization problem. KIRO is a fiber-optic network design problem, and due to its enormous number of variables, its search space reaches $10^{1223}$, making it extremely complex.
The results showed that Fable 5 delivered overwhelming performance. It not only produced the best solutions but also demonstrated unprecedented consistency on this problem, proving the sheer strength of pure intelligence.
Meanwhile, regarding /goal mode, which changes the model's control loop, we reached the following conclusions.
/goalmode is not simply a switch that makes the model 'try harder.'- This mode changes the exploration path and control loop, sometimes leading to better solutions, but sometimes wasting time on flawed ideas.
- As a result, we confirmed that
/goalmode is not a universal solution that improves performance in every situation.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.