AI Briefing
KOSign in

Two open-weights Qwen3.8-Flash-Next fine-tunes released: Victoria for coding/agents and Maple for Canadian context

·2026.09.30 14:18

Key point

Victoria achieves 70.0% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 using REAP pruning, while Maple improves Canadian regulatory accuracy from 6.6% to 21.8%.

Details

Two new open-weights fine-tunes of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next have been released, targeting specific use cases: Victoria for coding and agents, and Maple for Canadian regulatory context.

Victoria: Coding and Agents

Victoria utilizes the REAP technique to prune 44% of experts (reducing from 512 to 288 per layer) and is retrained at 4-bit (NVFP4) precision. Key performance metrics include:

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1: 70.0% (averaged over 3 runs), compared to 62.5% for the previous NVFP4 build.
  • HumanEval: 159/164.
  • Inference Speed: 280 tok/s single stream on a Dell B300 with the draft head, versus 135 tok/s without it.
  • Size: 48.0 GiB of weights, including the draft head. A separate 95.4 GiB n-gram table is not counted in that number. A GGUF Q4_K_M version is also available at 49.17 GiB, scoring 75.3% on Terminal-Bench (single run) and 93.2% on HumanEval (averaged over 5 runs).

Maple: Canadian Context

Maple is fine-tuned to default to Canadian answers for taxes, benefits, and regulations, addressing the tendency of base models to default to US contexts. On 600 held-out questions with search enabled:

  • Citing official Canadian sources: Increased from 6.0% to 62.9%.
  • Fully correct answers: Increased from 6.6% to 21.8%.
  • "No answer" responses: Decreased from 47.2% to 23.7%.
  • Coding performance: Remains strong at 157/164 on HumanEval.

Technical Notes

  • llama.cpp Compatibility: The GGUF includes a draft head not yet supported by mainline llama.cpp, causing errors. Users must currently build from the rmonsurate/llama.cpp fork (branch qwen4exp-mtp).
  • Evaluation Method: Maple's grading was performed by an AI judge panel; human review has not yet occurred.

This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.

Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.