SSD Architecture and Benchmarking: Performance Differences by Cell Type and Reliable Testing Methods
Key point
Analyzes the lifespan and latency differences among SLC, MLC, and TLC, emphasizing the importance of 'Pre-conditioning' through sustained random writes.
Details
NAND flash memory exhibits clear differences in bit storage capacity, lifespan (P/E cycles), and latency depending on the SLC, MLC, and TLC types. SLC stores 1 bit, offering a long lifespan of 100,000 P/E cycles and low latency, while TLC stores 3 bits, resulting in a lower unit cost but a shorter lifespan (5,000 P/E) and higher latency. Most consumer SSDs use MLC or TLC, whereas enterprise-grade SSDs use SLC.
The minimum read/write unit for an SSD is the Page (2KB~16KB), while deletion is possible only at the Block level (128~256 Pages). Performance figures from manufacturer datasheets may lack reliability during benchmarking due to short test durations. SSDs require 'Pre-conditioning' through sustained random writes (30 minutes to 4 hours) to observe performance degradation (Sustaining Mode) caused by contention between Garbage Collection and user requests.
Therefore, Pre-conditioning is necessary for reliable comparison, but worst-case performance does not guarantee optimal performance in actual production environments. It is important to develop in-house benchmarking tools tailored to the specific workloads of each system to comprehensively analyze various metrics such as Throughput, IOPS, and Latency.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.