AI Briefing
KO

Ollama Cloud Benchmark

·2026.04.28 07:45

Key point

Across 36 test runs, v4-flash had zero downtime while v4-pro was the slowest.

Details

For 3 prompts focused on medical reasoning, deepseek-v3.2:cloud, deepseek-v4-pro:cloud, deepseek-v4-flash:cloud, and glm-5.1:cloud were compared.

  • Each combination was run 3 times each, for a total of 36 runs.
  • Settings were temp=0.3, top_p=0.9, max_tokens=2000, calling /api/generate through the local Ollama gateway.
  • Transient errors were handled with 1 automatic retry (5-second delay).

Performance varied widely by model.

  • deepseek-v4-pro:cloud: averaged 124.8s, the slowest, but had the highest average token count at 3,149.
  • deepseek-v4-flash:cloud: averaged 67.7s, with 0 hard fails and 0 silent retries, making it the most stable.
  • deepseek-v3.2:cloud: averaged 55.1s, with 1 hard fail and 2 silent retries.
  • glm-5.1:cloud: averaged 101.8s, with the highest throughput at 53.8 tok/s, but had 1 hard fail.

Overall, transient Ollama Cloud issues occurred in 6 out of 36 runs (17%).

  • 3 were HTTP 500 errors, which recovered after 1 retry.
  • 3 hit the 240-second timeout, and retries also failed.

Due to cloud endpoint constraints, token throughput was calculated based on Ollama's total_duration.

This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.

Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.