Comparing 6 Codex CLI Workflows
·2026.04.29 05:17
Key point
The pipeline structures of 6 Codex CLI workflows were compared in a single table.
Details
The 6 Codex CLI workflows were organized into a single table.
The common flow is Research → Plan → Execute → Review → Ship, with each system differing in its detailed steps and sub-loop placement.
- Superpowers:
brainstorming→writing-plans→subagent-driven-development→test-driven-development→requesting-code-review→finishing-a-development-branch - Spec Kit:
/speckit.constitution→/speckit.specify→/speckit.plan→/speckit.tasks→/speckit.implement - gstack:
/office-hours→/plan-ceo-review→/plan-eng-review→/plan-design-review→implement→/review→/qa→/ship→/land-and-deploy - Get Shit Done:
/gsd-new-project→/gsd-discuss-phase→/gsd-plan-phase→/gsd-execute-phase→/gsd-verify-work→/gsd-ship→/gsd-complete-milestone - oh-my-codex:
$deep-interview→$ralplan→$ralph - Compound Engineering:
/ce-ideate→/ce-brainstorm→/ce-plan→/ce-work→/ce-code-review→/ce-compound→repeat
The steps marked in yellow are sub-loops, repeated per task, per story, or until verification passes. Overall pipeline length ranged from 3 steps to 9 steps.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.