AI Briefing
KO

Is the Future of the World All a Lie? Where Do We Go From Here?

·2026.04.16 22:32

Key point

The author argues that, facing the confusion and risks created by LLMs, we should pause and refuse.

Details

Just as personal automobiles reshaped the structure of cities, the author views AI/LLMs as a technology set to greatly change the shape of work and society.

But that change hasn't brought only convenience—it has also brought problems already spreading everywhere: slop, false information, auto-generated spam, moderation burdens, rising power costs, and technical debt.

The author says this trend is directly invading people's individual work and lives.

  • Search results and services across the board are flooded with low-quality generated content.
  • LLMs are replacing or blurring customer support, contracts, development, writing, and even relationships.
  • Even if current capabilities seem fine, as the technology grows more powerful, the scale of harm could become far greater.

As the best response to this, the author proposes stopping.

  • Reduce or refuse LLM use at home and at work.
  • Push back on generated content sent by colleagues and clients.
  • Resist company demands to adopt Copilot/Gemini, and support labor unions and regulation.
  • Oppose policies such as tax breaks for data centers.

However, this isn't a call for total rejection. The author acknowledges that very limited, verifiable uses—for example, narrow tasks like figuring out a lighting protocol to build a client library—can still be used.

The core argument is to slow down reckless adoption and buy time to protect human thinking ability, skill, and social safeguards.

This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.

Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.