Technique for Calibrating LLMs' Verbal Confidence
Key point
Research has been published on reducing the gap between LLMs' internal confidence and verbal expression through probe-targeted fine-tuning.
Details
LLMs recognize with high accuracy (0.76–0.88 AUROC) whether their answers are correct through their internal states (hidden states), yet tend to show 99% confidence for all questions when actually answering. This is due to a 'text bottleneck phenomenon' where the model internally knows whether the answer is correct but fails to express this in language.
The researchers addressed this problem through Probe-targeted fine-tuning (LoRA). By using the model's internal probe output as the target for fine-tuning, they trained the model to verbally express the confidence it already internally recognizes.
Key findings:
- Generality: Effectiveness was verified across 8 models (4 model families) ranging from 7B to 70B in scale.
- Proof of causality: Through activation patching, a causal relationship was confirmed where replacing hidden states at specific positions changes confidence.
- Discovery of the bottleneck: In the case of the 70B model, it was observed that while valid metacognitive signals exist in the softmax distribution, the model becomes fixed at 99% confidence at the text output (argmax) stage.
The research code is available on GitHub, and the paper is published on Zenodo.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.