Opus 4.7 is lazy
·2026.04.22 01:25
Key point
In a one-shot SVG benchmark, Opus 4.7 was much cheaper than 4.6.
1 / 2
Details
On OpenRouter, with reasoning high and max_tokens 100k settings, Qwen 3.6, Opus 4.6, and Opus 4.7 were compared on the same pelican-bicycle SVG prompt.
- With the basic prompt, Opus 4.7 produced the shortest output, using the least tokens at around 20 tokens.
- Even with the
think hardprompt added, 4.7 stayed around 95 tokens, while 4.6 and Qwen each used about 500 tokens. - When structured instructions and a
viewBox="0 0 1200 1200"condition were added, all three models produced plausible SVGs, but 4.7 still produced the smallest result. - Total costs were Qwen 3.6 $0.0653 / 40.7KB, Opus 4.6 $4.0250 / 34.5KB, and Opus 4.7 $0.6447 / 22.6KB.
4.7 was much cheaper than 4.6 and also produced smaller results, but the experiment was a SVG generation benchmark run only once each, so there are limits to generalizing from it.
This summary was generated automatically by AI. Check the original for the author's claims and context. Copyright belongs to the original author.
Our guide explains how the AI works. Report summary errors, attribution issues, or removal requests via Contact.